Supreme Court Criticizes Ranveer Allahbadia’s Remarks, Restricts New Shows Amid Legal Battle
New Delhi: The Supreme Court has granted interim relief to YouTuber and podcaster Ranveer Allahbadia in connection with multiple FIRs filed against him for alleged obscene remarks made during an online show. However, the Court imposed strict conditions, barring him from releasing any new content until further orders.
A bench of justices expressed strong disapproval of Allahbadia’s statements, calling them inappropriate and reflective of a “perverted mind.” The Court remarked that such language promotes a toxic culture and disrespects societal values. Emphasizing the need for accountability in digital media, the judges questioned the boundaries of humour and responsible content creation.
Justice Surya Kant asked, “ The words you have used will make daughters, sisters, parents and even the society feel ashamed. It shows a perverted mind. If this is not obscenity, what is it ? Why should we quash the or club the FIR’s against you?”
The controversy erupted after Allahbadia’s comments on a web-based show sparked outrage, leading to legal complaints in multiple states. In response, he issued a public apology, admitting that his remarks were inappropriate and regrettable. Despite this, legal proceedings continued, with authorities investigating the impact of his statements on public decency laws.
As part of the interim relief, the Court directed Allahbadia to surrender his passport and refrain from engaging in any public broadcasts or online shows. The restriction will remain in place until the next hearing, during which the Court is expected to deliberate on whether to consolidate the FIRs and establish clearer guidelines on digital content regulation.
The case has reignited discussions about online freedom of expression versus responsible content creation, with many questioning where the line should be drawn in the evolving landscape of digital media.
Dhanya Reddy S
Alma Media School Student
